journal

Notes on the creator economy.

Our point of view on creators, content and helping brands show up. No fluff, no jargon, just what we're seeing actually work.

New pieces every so often, when we have something worth saying.

Point of view · Creators

Follower count is a vanity metric.

The biggest account in the room is rarely the one that sells. Here's what we look at instead.

When a brand asks us to find a creator, the first question is usually about reach. It's the wrong first question. A creator with fifteen thousand engaged followers who genuinely use your kind of product will almost always outperform a big account whose audience scrolls straight past.

What actually moves people is trust and fit. Does this person feel like someone your customer would listen to? Does their content look like it belongs in your world? Reach only starts to matter once those two things are true.

So we cast for fit first. We look at how an audience responds, not just how big it is, and we match the face to the brand rather than the other way round.

Point of view · Working with creators

Build a roster, not a one-off.

The brands that win with creators treat them like a team, not a transaction.

One-off creator posts can work, but they rarely build anything. The brand gets a spike, then goes quiet, then starts again from scratch next time.

A roster is different. When the same handful of creators work with you across months, they learn your product, your tone and your audience. The content gets better and faster each round, and your brand starts to feel familiar to the people watching.

That familiarity is the whole game. People buy from brands they recognise, and recognition comes from showing up with the same faces, consistently.

Point of view · Content

Most briefs are bad, and it shows.

Great content usually starts with a clear brief. Vague briefs get vague results.

When content comes back flat, the brief is usually the reason. "Make something fun for the launch" gives a creator nothing real to aim at.

A good brief is specific about the goal, the audience, the message and where the content will live. It gives creators enough direction to do their best work, and enough freedom to make it feel like them.

We spend real time on the brief before anyone shoots. It's the cheapest way to get content you can actually use.

Point of view · Industry

UGC isn't a trend. It's the baseline.

Creator content stopped being a nice-to-have. It's now what people expect to see.

For a while, creator-style content was the experimental line on the budget. That time has passed. Audiences now expect to see real people using products, and polished-only feeds can feel distant.

This doesn't mean campaign photography is dead. It means the mix has changed. The brands that feel current run a blend: creator content for trust and volume, higher-end work for the moments that deserve it.

Getting that mix right, and keeping it fed, is most of what we do.

Point of view · Strategy

Consistency beats virality.

Chasing one viral moment is a worse plan than showing up well every week.

Everyone wants the video that blows up. Almost no one can repeat it on purpose. Building a brand on the hope of going viral is building on sand.

Consistency is the opposite. It's less exciting, but it compounds. A steady stream of on-brand content keeps you in front of people, builds recognition and gives you far more shots at the occasional big moment.

We'd take a brand that shows up well every week over one that goes quiet between viral attempts, every time.

subscribe

Get new pieces in your inbox.

Occasional notes on creators, content and what's working. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Reading this because you need content? Let's talk.